What if… pick winners for the 47 remaining games, conference and non-conference
Championship race what-if
The percentage is the chance of reaching the championship game, not of winning it or of finishing first. Two teams get there, so these add up to about 200%. Clinch/elimination statuses are proven by strict win-count arithmetic — no tiebreaker can undo them. Exhaustive scenario math unlocks when the remaining schedule becomes enumerable. Percentages are championship-game odds from 40,000 season simulations (win probabilities from an ensemble of Big12ology (2026), Elo (2026), FPI (2026), SP+ (2026), SRS (2026)); proofs override odds. Reflects real results until you pick a game; from then on it re-runs in your browser on the season your picks describe.
Conference standings · 25 of 72 games played what-if
| Team | Conf | Pct | Non-conf | Overall | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3–0 | 1.000 | 3–0 | 6–0 | |
| 2 | 3–0 | 1.000 | 3–0 | 6–0 | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.000 | 3–0 | 6–0 | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 0.750 | 3–0 | 6–1 | |
| 5 | 2–1 | 0.667 | 3–0 | 5–1 | |
| 6 | 2–1 | 0.667 | 2–1 | 4–2 | |
| 7 | 2–1 | 0.667 | 2–1 | 4–2 | |
| 8 | 1–2 | 0.333 | 2–1 | 3–3 | |
| 9 | 1–2 | 0.333 | 2–1 | 3–3 | |
| 10 | 1–2 | 0.333 | 2–1 | 3–3 | |
| 11 | 1–2 | 0.333 | 2–1 | 3–3 | |
| 12 | 1–2 | 0.333 | 3–0 | 4–2 | |
| 13 | 1–2 | 0.333 | 3–0 | 4–2 | |
| 14 | 1–3 | 0.250 | 3–0 | 4–3 | |
| 15 | 0–3 | 0.000 | 2–1 | 2–4 | |
| 16 | 0–3 | 0.000 | 2–1 | 2–4 |
1 How the three-way tie breaks — BYU, Texas Tech and Utah
- (a) Not all tied teams played each other and no team defeated all others — proceed to next step.
- (b) Common conference opponents: none — proceed.
- (c) Walked full standings without a single leader — proceed.
- (d) Opponents' combined conference record: BYU 4-5 (0.444), Texas Tech 4-6 (0.400), Utah 1-8 (0.111) — BYU seeded.
- Restarting procedure for remaining tied teams: Texas Tech, Utah.
- (a) Head-to-head: Texas Tech and Utah did not play.
- (b) vs common opponents (Colorado): Texas Tech 1.000, Utah 1.000 — still tied.
- (c) Walked full standings without a single leader — proceed.
- (d) Opponents' combined conference record: Texas Tech 4-6 (0.400), Utah 1-8 (0.111) — Texas Tech seeded.
2 How the three-way tie breaks — Arizona, Baylor and Oklahoma State
- (a) Not all tied teams played each other and no team defeated all others — proceed to next step.
- (b) Common conference opponents: none — proceed.
- (c) vs [Arizona State/Cincinnati/Iowa State/Kansas State/TCU/UCF]: Arizona 1-0, Baylor 1-1, Oklahoma State 1-0 — separates some but no single leader; continuing down the standings.
- (c) Walked full standings without a single leader — proceed.
- (d) Opponents' combined conference record: Arizona 5-5 (0.500), Baylor 2-7 (0.222), Oklahoma State 5-6 (0.455) — Arizona seeded.
- Restarting procedure for remaining tied teams: Baylor, Oklahoma State.
- (a) Head-to-head: Baylor and Oklahoma State did not play.
- (b) Common conference opponents: none — proceed.
- (c) vs next-highest-placed common opponent group [Arizona State/Cincinnati/Iowa State/Kansas State/TCU/UCF]: Baylor 1-1, Oklahoma State 1-0 — Oklahoma State seeded.
3 How the six-way tie breaks — Arizona State, Cincinnati, Iowa State, Kansas State, TCU and UCF
- (a) Not all tied teams played each other and no team defeated all others — proceed to next step.
- (b) Common conference opponents: none — proceed.
- (c) Walked full standings without a single leader — proceed.
- (d) Opponents' combined conference record: Arizona State 5-4 (0.556), Cincinnati 4-6 (0.400), Iowa State 7-3 (0.700), Kansas State 4-6 (0.400), TCU 6-3 (0.667), UCF 6-4 (0.600) — Iowa State seeded.
- Restarting procedure for remaining tied teams: Arizona State, Cincinnati, Kansas State, TCU, UCF.
- (a) Not all tied teams played each other and no team defeated all others — proceed to next step.
- (b) Common conference opponents: none — proceed.
- (c) Walked full standings without a single leader — proceed.
- (d) Opponents' combined conference record: Arizona State 5-4 (0.556), Cincinnati 4-6 (0.400), Kansas State 4-6 (0.400), TCU 6-3 (0.667), UCF 6-4 (0.600) — TCU seeded.
- Restarting procedure for remaining tied teams: Arizona State, Cincinnati, Kansas State, UCF.
- (a) Not all tied teams played each other and no team defeated all others — proceed to next step.
- (b) Common conference opponents: none — proceed.
- (c) Walked full standings without a single leader — proceed.
- (d) Opponents' combined conference record: Arizona State 5-4 (0.556), Cincinnati 4-6 (0.400), Kansas State 4-6 (0.400), UCF 6-4 (0.600) — UCF seeded.
- Restarting procedure for remaining tied teams: Arizona State, Cincinnati, Kansas State.
- (a) Not all tied teams played each other and no team defeated all others — proceed to next step.
- (b) Common conference opponents: none — proceed.
- (c) Walked full standings without a single leader — proceed.
- (d) Opponents' combined conference record: Arizona State 5-4 (0.556), Cincinnati 4-6 (0.400), Kansas State 4-6 (0.400) — Arizona State seeded.
- Restarting procedure for remaining tied teams: Cincinnati, Kansas State.
- (a) Head-to-head: Cincinnati defeated Kansas State.
4 How the two-way tie breaks — Colorado and Kansas
- (a) Head-to-head: Colorado and Kansas did not play.
- (b) vs common opponents (Utah): Colorado 0.000, Kansas 0.000 — still tied.
- (c) Walked full standings without a single leader — proceed.
- (d) Opponents' combined conference record: Colorado 8-1 (0.889), Kansas 5-4 (0.556) — Colorado seeded.
The conference breaks ties only to name the two championship-game participants; positions below that stay tied in its official standings. This table sorts every tie for readability — see The Standings for both boards side by side.
Why is my team where they are? what-if
Follows your what-if picks when they're active. Full walkthrough of the procedure: The Rules.